Some Australian parents and children organisations are outraged that the government will not implement tighter classification laws for ‘raunchy’ music videos.
According to the government, there ‘was a ‘low level’ of community concern about music videos’. They also said they had no power over the Advertising Standards Board, presumably in response to calls for stricter controls on advertising.
Barbara Biggins, of the Australian Council on Children in the Media, said young children’s exposure to sex-charged videos was a serious concern.
“Children are increasingly exposed to a hyper-sexualised media in what has been described as the ‘pornification’ of our culture,” she said.
[...]
Julie Gale, of Kids Free 2B Kids, said the response showed a continued reluctance to respond to concerns about the sexualisation of children.
“It also fails to address many of the concerns of child development professionals and increasing evidence from research,” she said.
Family First senator Steve Fielding said the Government had gone soft on the issue.
“The response is weak,” Senator Fielding said.
“Someone’s got to them.”
Maybe it was common sense, Mr Fielding?
But apparently that’s lacking, as one angry parent explains:
I take my kids to the local 7/11 for slurpies and they are confronted with a prominent display of condoms, right at the front counter, instead of a discreet corner somewhere else, like near the women’s sanitary wear. Common sense?
Imagine if they placed tampons on the counter. Anarchy!
There’s some other great ones as well:
As a caring parent, I have a right and responsibity to ensure that my children are exposed to sexualised content at a rate and to a degree that I decide is appropriate for their age and maturity. Corporate interests are at absolute odds – indeed are in direct conflict with this right. By any sane assessment I should surely win this conflict but weak-kneed politicians espousing ‘industry self-regulation’ as the solution will ensure that I do not. Let me make it clear by example. I should NOT be endlessly forced to explain the issues surrounding erectile dysfunction to an inquisitive 6 year soaking up the world from the safety of a child restraint seat… – John Colville of Sth Yarra
It would be nice if it were as simple as turning the TV off. But what happens when you go to a shopping centre, fast food outlet, bowling etc and videos of half naked teenagers dancing around polls are playing on large screens in front of you. Are we supposed to make sure our kids don’t leave the house so they aren’t subjected to this trash? – Isla Smyth
Even if one considers billboards about erectile dysfunction to be sexual in nature (as opposed to a health issue), the fact an advertisement mentions sex does not mean it sexualises children or inappropriate for public consumption.



11 comments
Rastko says:
Aug 23, 2009
Children are your responsibilities… If you have no time to raise your children and supervise them than you did not have to bring them to this world. If you thought that parenting is easy you’re mistaken.
If you want government and Fielding to raise your kids for you then send them to Catholic schools and remote monasteries.
After all you are not capable of doing your job.
Andrew says:
Aug 23, 2009
Christ, the day that Fielding is kicked out of his senate seat at the next election, I will be a very proud Australian. The fact that he got elected on 2% of the primary vote in Victoria and yet has such power in the senate makes me question the whole senate election system.
I’m thinking of having a ‘fuck off Fielding’ party at the next election…….
Matthew says:
Aug 24, 2009
Julie Gale (of Kids Free 2B Kids) was the one who was so concerned about the sexualisation of children she logicly forced Coles Petrol Station to remove adult magazines. Um yeah, that will help… There’s alo another nutbag group ( http://www.sayno4kids.com ) wanting to ban adult magazines (and stuff like Ralph) from newsagent shelves because “If cigarettes can go back behind the counter, why not porn?”. Yes, because Penthouse causes cancer. Or something.
Rastko, it’s a horrible thought that someone would want to Senator Fielding to raise their children. I’d rather them not to grow up messed up and homophobic.
Mr1979 says:
Aug 24, 2009
facepalm!
Gee you would think that supervising kids would be an actual parents job. I am so effing bloody sick to death of some parents palming off their responsibility of their kids to someone else or the Government.
Our government is a complete joke.
Jimboot says:
Aug 24, 2009
Some of their kids are also fat I’ve noticed. Maybe the Govt should put them on a diet too.
James says:
Aug 24, 2009
*Barbara Biggins*, of the Australian Council on Children in the Media, said young children’s exposure to sex-charged videos was a serious concern.
“Children are increasingly exposed to a hyper-sexualised media in what has been described as the ‘pornification’ of our culture,” she said.
Bar-bra Big’uns.
Sometimes, life writes the punchlines for you.
Kath says:
Aug 24, 2009
Classification is there for a reason. It’s all about that “appropriateness of audience/venue thing” again. So many parents refuse to take responsibility for what their kids see (and what they educate their kids about) and expect either schools or the Government to do it for them.
If you don’t want your kids to see it, don’t plonk them in front of the telly like it’s a babysitter. Same goes for any other media.
bob says:
Aug 27, 2009
*note to parents* the TV/computer/radio are not babysitters. for the health and safety of your children please hire a real baby sitter or better still DO YOUR JOB AND WATCH YOUR CHILDREN.
i repeat get off your fat ass. put down the premixed vodka and actually WATCH YOUR CHILDREN.
tv is for entertainment purposes only not a babysitter.
if you cant do your job then obviously you are not a fit parent and should put your child in foster care.
if any concerned parents are reading this then i have to tell you i don’t give a shit about your children.
now go watch a current affair/today tonight or whatever it is that you mouth breathers do.
Jayson says:
Aug 28, 2009
Bob has just hit the nail right on the fucking head!
I am so sick of these poor excuses of parents looking for scapegoats to cover up their screw ups.
Amy says:
Nov 30, 2009
I remember seeing condoms and magazines when I young.
They didn’t interest me at all and I paid them no attention.
At about six I started asking what they were, where babies *really* come from, etc. It was explained to me. Apparently this has scared me for life.
It disgusted me at the time and I paid no more attention to the issue until puberty.
Peter says:
Jul 10, 2010
‘Even if one considers billboards about erectile dysfunction to be sexual in nature (as opposed to a health issue), the fact an advertisement mentions sex does not mean it sexualises children or inappropriate for public consumption.’
For goodness sake – a ‘health issue’!? Since when? This is ridiculous. You cannot compare such a non-issue to, for example, getting regular check-ups at you GP to ensure you do not have cancer. The comparison is absurd and illogical.