Fallout 3 banned for in-game drug use?

July 6, 2008 – 6:16 pm

Fallout 3 banned?

Rumor around the gaming community is that Fallout 3 has been refused classification in Australia because it contains drug use. A user on the GameSpot forums says a friend who works for the ‘OFLC’ had revealed to them that Fallout 3 has been banned for its in-game use of morphine.

Under the National Classification Code, Computer games that deal with drug misuse or addiction can be refused classification:

Computer Games that depict, express or otherwise deal with matters of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the standards of morality, decency and propriety generally accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified;

GameSpot contacted the Classification Board, who said no final decision had been made in regards to Fallout 3, but confirmed it had been submitted for classification. The games distributor Red Ant Enterprises refused to comment.

Bogus or true? There’s nothing in the Classification database yet, so I guess we’ll find out in a week or two.

Nude model wants to marry a farmer! Good heavens, not in Australia!

July 2, 2008 – 9:33 pm

Okay, we all know the only reason News.com.au published a story about a former AbbyWinters (NSFW) model and current contestant on Channel Nine’s The Farmer Wants A Wife is because the mention of boobs is a surefire click booster. At the end of the day it’s her business if she wants to shack up with a farmer on a reality TV show. What’s it matter if she’s posed nude?

But here’s where it get’s stupid:

Angela Conway from the Australian Family Association says casting agencies need to take more responsibility.

WTF. An adult model is not allowed to appear on TV, Angela? She’s not allowed to get married? I’m not quite sure where Angela’s going with that comment.

I watched the video and saw the pictures on AbbyWinters a few weeks back and they are tastefully done. Many would even consider them art — which is a lot more than I can say for the trash that News.com.au chruns out.

Police pre-approve Pope Day protest placards, t-shirts

July 2, 2008 – 8:03 pm

Pope hits up the Cross

Police have warned that organisations protesting during World Youth Day events will need to have placards, banners and t-shirts pre-approved. If they don’t, they risk losing their right to protest according SMH:

During a meeting with two leading victims groups yesterday, senior police said protesters would also have to include details of their planned messages.

Protesting without police clearance could result in demonstrators being charged under extraordinary new powers which came into effect yesterday.

[..]

“We will protect our civil liberties, and help young people to protect their health, and no Pope or premier will stop us,” said Rachel Evans,a spokeswoman for the NoToPope coalition, which is planning to hand out condoms at a July 19 rally.

I wonder if recent sex shop raids are a message to Pope Day attendees that Sydney is serious about cleaning up its act. We repent!

Clean feed trial complete

July 2, 2008 – 6:54 pm

A laboratory trial of the Government’s ISP filter has finished and a report is now in Senator Conroy’s hands. Conroy’s office says it’s too early to comment on the Tassie trial, but we do know live field trials are next and that letters circulating suggest the Government plans to coordinate with other countries who have block lists and restrict net access.

Visit NoCleanFeed.com to find out why filtering won’t ‘protect children’ (as if technology designed to censor ever could) and how you can stop it.

The Gruen Transfer tackle the Beaver Tampon Ad

July 1, 2008 – 7:25 pm

Have you watched The Gruen Transfer? It’s a great show on ABC where Will Anderson and a panel of advertising execs dismantle advertisements, compete to sell whale meat, and talk about controversial ads. A week or two back they looked at the Emma Thompson human trafficking video, tomorrow it’s the Kotex Beaver ad that had the Goody-goody Brigade screaming like nutters for better beaver and tampon working conditions … I think! Watch it Wednesdays 9PM ABC 1.

Updated 2 July 2008 - Here’s the discussion:

Download past episodes from the ABC website.

ShellShock 2 refused classification

June 30, 2008 – 7:32 pm

You won’t be buying the Vietnam War era horror game ShellShock 2: Blood Trails off the shelf in Australia anytime soon. The Classification Board has refused classification and early reports suggest Atari (who publishes the game in Aus) won’t be resubmitting an edited version. That might change though as Atari has now retracted statements and gone the no comment route.

GameArena reports:

Atari got back to us with a Sonic-fast response on the RC - they haven’t got many details, but the Refused Classification might be related to “post-mortem damage” - kicking an enemy when they’re well and truly down.

Four years ago, ShellShock: Nam ‘67 was also refused classification, but an edited version was later submitted an rated MA15+. More on that case at Refused-Classifcation.com.

ShellShock: Nam ‘67 was banned in 2004

If you’re thinking of shopping overseas, RC also has a good article on the realities of importing games here.

Games are a small fraction of what is confiscated. In our films database we have over fifty reports of titles being stopped since 2000. In our games database we have one report of a commercial quantity of a banned game being stopped. Now we are in no way condoning that you should go out and import RC games, we are simply stating all the information that we have.

Sexualisation report released today

June 26, 2008 – 6:47 pm

I haven’t had time to fully read the Goverment’s report on Sexualisation of Children in the Contemporary Media, but at first glance it doesn’t appear they’ve fallen prey to the hysteria and scaremongering that was thrown around like a ragdoll by certain groups and moral crusaders. I’ll cover the good and bad from the report on this blog over the weekend, but in the meantime you can read it yourself here (PDF).

Here’s a sample:

1.50  The shock value of a term like ‘corporate paedophilia’ may help to stimulate debate on the general question of the targeting of children as consumers, of which sexualisation is a particularly damaging subset, but it also distorts that debate. Targeting children through advertising, creation of the ‘tween’ market and the presentation of inappropriately sexualised  images of children as part of these processes may be reprehensible and potentially damaging but it is not comparable to the criminal, physical, sexual assault of children.

Cheers to Irene on the STOP Censorship mailing list for the tip off.

Classification Amendment Bill brings about changes to advertising and assessment

June 25, 2008 – 8:03 pm

The Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Amendment (Assessments and Advertising) Bill 2008 passed the Senate this week. Here’s a brief look at some of the changes:

  • The Bill allows unclassified films and computer games to be advertised before they are classified, providing they meet set conditions and are assessed as part of a new industry self-assessment scheme. A safeguard exists to prevent advertisements being shown in a film/game where the advertised content would likely be classified at a higher level to the film/game it’s being shown.
  • The definition of ‘advertisement’ explicitly includes advertising on the internet.
  • ‘Advertisement’ now excludes product merchandising such as toys, drink bottles and lunchboxes.
  • The definition of ‘decision’ has been amended so a Classification Board decision on the likely classification of an unclassified film or computer game can be reviewed by the Classification Review Board.
  • Recognition that classifying a Television Series (for say a DVD) is different to classifying a film. This introduces an industry self-assessment scheme where a series has been broadcast in Australia.
  • The new advertising scheme does not apply to material that is likely to be classified X 18+ or RC.

Read the bill online here or download the PDF.

These changes will hopefully make it easier for producers to advertise and classify their content. Unfortunately, there doesn’t appear to be any relief for the adult industry.

Gold Coast teen charged for wearing blasphemous T-shirt

June 25, 2008 – 12:50 pm

Jesus is a cunt t-shirtWould someone please prick me with a virtual fork. A Gold Coast teen has been charged with offensive behaviour after police arrested him on Monday for wearing a T-shirt by metal band Cradle of Filth that reads ‘Jesus is a cunt’ and has a picture of a nun masturbating.

It doesn’t look very classy, but c’mon, this isn’t that town from Footloose. John Lithgow isn’t running QLD (Anna Bligh is… oh).

News.com.au reports:

The Reverend Matt Hunt of the Helensvale Baptist Church said it was sad people spoke about the Lord in such a way.

“It’s fairly common language these days to express sadness, anger or hurt,” he said. “It’s a degrading word to use and Jesus is anything but that. It’s like calling white black.”

Mr Hunt said using the Lord’s name in vain was a serious sin. 

“When someone comes to the point of saying Jesus is the devil or Jesus is ‘expletive’, the Bible does say be very careful because you’re on thin ice.”

I’m waiting for Kevin Bacon to somersault through my office window.

 Kevin Bacon in Footloose

Lawyer Bill Potts said the arrest highlighted the need for a Bill of Rights in Australia.

“If a person was wearing the shirt in a church or a religious rally where it was specifically intended to offend or cause disruption, then perhaps the prosecution might stand a chance.

“However, to criminalise juvenile or boorish messages is to bring the law into disrepute. The police are acting like the thought police and censors.”

I think the arrest also highlights the need for a bit of f’ing common sense. You mind your business, and I’ll mind mine.

SBS Insight: The Naked Eye review

June 24, 2008 – 10:58 pm

SBS Naked Eye - Bill Henson Art Debate

When Bob Bain posted to the No Censorship mailing list that SBS would be airing a debate on the Bill Henson saga, I questioned whether their was anything left to add that print media hadn’t already covered. Bob reassured me that the people on the guest list could add more.

I feared it might turn out to be an hour of Hetty Johnston’s one trick pony objection to the Henson photographs, but put my trust in Jenny Brockie’s ability to never hold a one sided debate. I’m glad I tuned in.

The Guests

Hetty remained firmly grounded and didn’t sway from her previous criticisms of Bill Henson’s work. She called for the art industry to take responsibility and for a formal review system to be implemented to review and decide on artist’s intentions before they photograph children.

But like so many others who have called for censorship of a piece of artwork or film, Hetty too admitted she had not seen the Henson exhibit, nor did she have any desire to see it. As pointed out later in the show by another guest, not seeing the photographs in the exhibit means she cannot fully recognize or appreciate the context the photos were taken in.

Sandy Edwards spoke passionately about her experiences as an artist, as did Connie Petrillo, a Perth artist who faced charges in 1995 for taking naked photographs of her sons for coursework. She was found not guilty in two court battles. The relentless and unwarranted attack by authorities was evidently traumatising on her life and work.

Sandy found it unbelievable that a person could not take naked photographs in the right context.

Two former models also spoke of their experiences, neither regretting their decision. A number of other teenagers commented that they didn’t find the Henson images, or other images shown offensive. One (not a model) also commented that being the same age as the Henson model, she felt she would quite capable of making an informed decision and would say no.

David Marr believes many opponents of Henson’s work are trying to create a new taboo, which they believe is useful in fight against those who commit crimes against children.

Stephen Smallbone, a criminologist from Griffith University pointed out their was some belief that photographs like Henson’s may cause people to abuse children, but said that the assumption is not borne out by the evidence.

Adam Leek, a former police officer and now a gallery owner said the police failed to use discretion when dealing with the Henson case. He said the action taken was not needed.

Michael Bianchino got a laugh from the crowd when he explained his experience photographing his daughters netball team. He says the Henson incident has made sports clubs paranoid about photography at events.

Lindy Allan, Director of Regional Arts in Victoria, wasn’t opposed to the work of artists like Connie Petrillo, but found Henson’s ‘constructed vision’ disturbing. Vivian Gaston expressed concern over the model’s ability to give consent.

As per usual (and I’m not trying to be humorous or nasty),  Angela Conway from the Australian Family Association added nothing of value to the debate. She only further verified that her organisation gets way too much undeserved recognition.

The Internet did get a cop a minor flogging (it declined to appear on the show), but David Marr spoke in its defense. He pointed out we can’t limit what we do in the real world because of fears it will be misused in the cyber world.

The Result

All in all it was a decent episode, with a few top class moments. Such as the Unidentified woman yelling at Hetty - ‘You act as a moral guardian for the whole community!’

I wonder what value Hetty’s checks and balances plan offers artists and children. If the aim is stop a crime being committed, it’s a bit like asking a bank robber to get permission before he commits a robbery. Real artists are the only ones who are penalised with this sort of scheme, as real child abusers go on as normal. That doesn’t protect children, nor will it protect unwarranted public crucifixions of other artists in the future.

If one things for sure, Hetty remains firm and will continue to fight. She admitted if she was writing legislation, she’d make what Henson did illegal.


SBS Insight LogoYou can now watch the episode online at the SBS website. My recap was based on the old pen and paper method while watching the tele so I apologise for any errors.
Update:
Transcript here.