Clean feed won’t protect children

August 18, 2008 – 7:27 pm

Colin from EFA has written an article about the Government’s filtering plan for the MacTalk.com.au community that would be worth showing to any friends you have still unsure of what Stephen Conroy has in store for Australia.

It covers many of the problems that exist with the plan, but none more important than the fact mandatory ISP filtering will not protect children as touted:

‘Setting all these other objections aside, could this still be a good policy for the children? It’s hard to see how. Even the Government’s own research on online risks doesn’t support the idea of Internet filtering. Children do face real risks online, such as viruses, identity theft, cyber-bullying and even chat-room predators. A filter would do exactly nothing to mitigate these risks.’

‘So-called “content risks”, that is, accidental exposure to inappropriate content online, are much less significant than these other factors, and there is little in the way of hard evidence to suggest that kids are being bombarded with such material or that it is doing them any harm. In other words, the clean-feed filter is an expensive solution without a problem. There are better ways to spend a hundred million dollars if you want to safeguard the welfare of children.’

It would be interesting to see the Internet activity of an unaccompanied child monitored to record just how many inappropriate or adult sites they visit. Inappropriate is subjective (which is why it’s a problem) and I doubt they’d they come across too many adult sites. I browse the web for hours each day at work and rarely do I ’stumble’ upon adult content.

I admit my browsing habits are hardly scientific, but no less than the (elusive) evidence provided to suggest kids are accidentally being exposed adult content. The linked Cyber Safety document says Government research found ‘38 per cent of Australian children under the age of 13 have purposefully visited websites they think their parents would disapprove of them visiting.’

Don’t trust ‘Goverment research’ though! If you check out page one you’ll find that the ALP’s evidence of increased cyber-bullying, indenty theft and computer addiction is based on ‘recent media reports.’ The always reliable media — I guess there’s growth in Bigfoot activity too Mr Rudd?

Subscribe to RSS FEEDStay up to date with censorship issues affecting Australia by subscribing to my RSS feed. Click here.

You can also be notified of updates by email. Simply enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

  1. 7 Responses to “Clean feed won’t protect children”

  2. We’ll eventually need something like Freegate methinks..

    http://www.download.com/Freegate/3000-2085_4-10415391.html

    This program helps Internet users in China to access the Internet faster and more stably. Many users report that Freegate makes visiting overseas websites just as fast as visiting local ones. A unique encryption and compression algorithm is implemented to secure and optimize users online activities. If your selected language does not display correctly, please 1) download the dynamic link library (.dll) file from the Dynaweb download page, 2) place it in the same directory as Freegate’s executable (.exe) file, and 3) restart Freegate.

    Version 6.76 implements new encryption algorithm and supports simplified Chinese, traditional Chinese, English, and Farsi interfaces.

    ===========

    Don’t ask me for a review. I haven’t tested it and I’m not in China so I have no idea if it’s available from China - nor how many Chinese users are using it… nor if it’s use is prohibited by the government.

    By Bob Bain on Aug 19, 2008

  3. ‘38 per cent of Australian children under the age of 13 have purposefully visited websites they think their parents would disapprove of them visiting.’

    The most telling word here is “purposefully” can anyone really protect someone when they go looking for trouble.

    I don’t like to sound like a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist but the Govt has obviously got some hidden agenda and hiding it behind this smokescreen can only indicate it is all the more sinister.

    By Stevian on Aug 19, 2008

  4. @Bob: Seems to have positive reviews. There would no doubt be ones produced for Australians should it come to it. Would the Government outlaw circumvention tools, who knows.

    @Stevian: The filters will do little to stop those with intent. As the Tassie trial found, it would only take 11 or so tries before you got something that should be blocked. Worse, it won’t do a thing to stop those people who are actively seeking out illegal material.

    By Mike on Aug 19, 2008

  5. Bah. Fuck all these conservative politicians. Kids are being abused in the home at alarming rates, and yet these politicians waste their resources on BS bandaid solutions. Fuck them.

    By Rod Williams on Aug 20, 2008

  6. Kids don’t vote, so why protect them when you can protect the minds of adults.

    By Mike on Aug 20, 2008

  7. Wrote to my federal member, the Minister for defense - silence on this matter.

    By Sean the Blogonaut on Aug 29, 2008

  8. Him and Mr Rudd both.

    By Mike on Aug 29, 2008

Post a Comment