Comments on: Thursday wrap up: Henson aftermath, NZ on filtering, ALP form letters

By: Stevian

Stevian — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:28:36 +0000

@Max: I self-censored a term referring to people of African descent.

Where did I condemn homosexuals, I said, I find the equation Homosexual=Pedophiles repugnant, which means I don’t like people being labeled as pedophiles simply because they are attracted to members of the same sex, it is a non-sequiter. I added that I was a heterosexual to forestall a response like:

“That’s exactly what a child molesting Fag would say”

By: Fermista

Fermista — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:18:58 +0000

I’m pretty sure that by N*****s Stevian meant “Niggers” not “Nazis”.

Count the asterisks ;p

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:59:39 +0000

Stevian’s comments don’t condemn homosexuals. I believe Stevian was simply adding emphasis to the fact that this isn’t am argument that heterosexuals or homosexuals see differently based on their sexuality.

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:54:24 +0000

@Max: There’s no censorship of Nazi or Nazis here. Any N*zi, N@zi or N*z* is typed by the user directly, not altered by the blogging system.

By: Max Tivey

Max Tivey — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:53:32 +0000

Stevian: I’m not gay either, but don’t condemn those who are. Watch all the gay/lesbian sites get blocked by Fuc%head Conjob. It WILL happen. The internet is anarchic by nature, for fork’s sake keep it that way!!

By: Max Tivey

Max Tivey — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:50:24 +0000

Got to say that I was offended by you censoring the word ‘N@zis’. Don’t set yourself up as an anti-censorship site, then censor comments. You are as bad as the Govt. BTW: does anyone realise that Yahoo!7 is already applying draconian censorship to their news blogs? No, didn’t think so. WE are FORKED! I can’t see us winning this one, vital as it is that we do.

By: Fermista

Fermista — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:32:16 +0000

Stevian – I totally agree.
I also find it infuriating that these people are of the mentality that those that defend the rights of homosexuals must lean that way themselves.

“and I say that as a heterosexual”
It’s incredibly disappointing that clarifying statements like this are even necessary.

By: Stevian

Stevian — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:20:11 +0000

Since statements like this:

“Gay rights activists, paedophiles, homosexuals wanting to ‘hook up’ with underage school boys or view ‘bare-backing’ films, those addicted to hardcore pornography and all those who make a living from marketing such moral filth, have rubbished the Society’s suggestions for the implementation of such controls to prevent injury to the “public good”.

make rational debate impossible we can point out that this is “exactly what they did in Nazi Germany” without falling victim to Godwins Law. I’m surprised they haven’t included Communists, Jews and N*****s in their grab bag of miscellaneous demons. The equation of Homsexual=Pedophile is particularly repugnant,and I say that as a heterosexual.

By: Fermista

Fermista — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:48:39 +0000

“Gay rights activists, paedophiles, homosexuals wanting to ‘hook up’ with underage school boys or view ‘bare-backing’ films”

“Bare-backing films”??

Surely if they’re down with the porn-community lingo, they watch it themselves.

These radical social conservatives are total fucking hypocrites. How often do you hear about them denouncing tv shows or ads for containing “inappropriate content” when it obviously takes a mind that’s already in the gutter to pick it out in the first place?

Maybe their moral crusading is a way of offsetting their own moral shortcomings.