Comments on: Servos cave into family group pressure, drop porn mags

By: franko

franko — Sun, 07 Dec 2008 12:10:17 +0000

You may also be interested in this rant (http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/stories/s2429316.htm) by Melinda Tankard Reist of Women’s forum Australia where she puts forward her opinion that:

“If this material [allegedly sold in "milkbars, supermarkets and petrol stations] is allowed to be sold – and sold so openly – the Classification Board is sending a message that its okay to want sex with real ‘live young girls’”

By: SkipEU

SkipEU — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:53:39 +0000

Looks like in Australia you are obsessed with child-advocacy organisations because you have so many of them. Soon every child will have his own supporting organization. Who is financing them?

By: SkipEU

SkipEU — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:49:23 +0000

Nowadays they are using paedophilia for all sorts of lobbying. If you want to ban something just connect it somehow to paedophilia.

In Europe they sell all those really hardcore pornographic magazines and DVDs on petrol stations and no one is stupid enough to connect those to paedophils.

By: Stephen

Stephen — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:19:12 +0000

And everyone knows I can’t wait for the government to be brought to its knees Especially the thought of the policies we’ve had over the last decade and a half (and now more, thanks to KRudd) completely washed clean and people actually looking after their own families brings a tear to my eye

By: Colin

Colin — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:13:11 +0000

This is quite interesting. It means the wave of moral panic is gaining momentum, if anything – and even the oil companies feel enough community pressure to give in. On the same note, these child-advocacy organisations seem to be popping up. “Kids Free 2 B Kids?” (Adults using kids as a cover for their lobbying.)

Sooner or later the pendulum will swing back. The more successful the moral panic brigade are, the more significant will be the thawing once the tide turns.

By: Jarrod

Jarrod — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:35:33 +0000

If all the models in these magazines are above the legal age then there is no decent reason to have these magazines banned. It pisses me off when they make claims such as,”encourage the sexual penetration of under-age girls and some of the video/dvd advertisements validate crimes such as incest and rape.” and “pornography available in petrol stations and corner stores is encouraging paedophilia” without backing it up with any evidence. Servos already to enough to “protect the children” by placing those black cover in and ID checks when selling R18+ magazines.

By: Matthew

Matthew — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:53:14 +0000

Yeah, these magazines (mostly US titles; Cheri, High Society, Fox, and magazines that are offshoots of those publishers) are the SAME ONES disributed in newsagents, and judging from the bags with the black back and front two thirds covering everything but the magazine’s title, it’s from the same distributor.

So it’s those crappy censored Amercian magazines, with usually pages torn out or black stickers over the penetration stuff. So I’m assuming American men who read these magazines (all mainstream mens magazines who’ve been around for 30 years or more) are all paedophiles. I must also point out that in magazines like Fox, they included no ‘innocent-looking babes’. They all look like dirty whores to me.

Ah geez, I hope they don’t now go after newsagents now. I’m rather fond of the Paul Raymond published magazines. I’d rather not have to go online for this stuff as I prefer the UK published soft stuff.

By: James

James — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:58:19 +0000

“Innocent (legally adult) babes” are encouraging paedophilia?

So then, the publishers of Wanton Old Whores Monthly are presumably going to be able to continue selling at servos unmolested (pun intended).