<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SBS Insight want to talk to you about mandatory filtering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/sbs-insight-net-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/sbs-insight-net-censorship/</link>
	<description>Australian Censorship Discussion Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Searle</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/sbs-insight-net-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-4609</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Searle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2567#comment-4609</guid>
		<description>This is probably too late for the show. I have often wondered if Australians are aware that after Don Chipp ( the inaugural leader of the Australian Democrats ) managed to abolish censorship, child pornography was legally available in Australian newsagents and adult book shops in the 1970&#039;s.
I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s relevant, but anybody I&#039;ve told this too simply doesn&#039;t believe it. 
Speaking about the state of censorship before this Don Chipp being interviewed by Andrew Denton said  &#039;DON CHIPP: You didn&#039;t know what was banned and what wasn&#039;t. Intolerable.&#039;


ANDREW DENTON:  Were there some stupid bannings? Were these all sensual books, or…

DON CHIPP: &#039;Noddy&#039; was banned once.

ANDREW DENTON: &#039;Noddy&#039;.

DON CHIPP: Enid Blyton, because there is a place on page 84 which says &quot;And Noddy walked down a country lane and felt a little queer.&quot;

ANDREW DENTON: And that was banned in this country?

DON CHIPP: Yeah.

( Source http://www.abc.net.au/tv/enoughrope/transcripts/s1730839.htm )

Has history repeated itself? Will the censoring of the Internet result in the same idiocy? The whole world has gone mad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably too late for the show. I have often wondered if Australians are aware that after Don Chipp ( the inaugural leader of the Australian Democrats ) managed to abolish censorship, child pornography was legally available in Australian newsagents and adult book shops in the 1970&#8242;s.<br />
I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s relevant, but anybody I&#8217;ve told this too simply doesn&#8217;t believe it.<br />
Speaking about the state of censorship before this Don Chipp being interviewed by Andrew Denton said  &#8216;DON CHIPP: You didn&#8217;t know what was banned and what wasn&#8217;t. Intolerable.&#8217;</p>
<p>ANDREW DENTON:  Were there some stupid bannings? Were these all sensual books, or…</p>
<p>DON CHIPP: &#8216;Noddy&#8217; was banned once.</p>
<p>ANDREW DENTON: &#8216;Noddy&#8217;.</p>
<p>DON CHIPP: Enid Blyton, because there is a place on page 84 which says &#8220;And Noddy walked down a country lane and felt a little queer.&#8221;</p>
<p>ANDREW DENTON: And that was banned in this country?</p>
<p>DON CHIPP: Yeah.</p>
<p>( Source <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/tv/enoughrope/transcripts/s1730839.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc.net.au/tv/enoughrope/transcripts/s1730839.htm</a> )</p>
<p>Has history repeated itself? Will the censoring of the Internet result in the same idiocy? The whole world has gone mad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/sbs-insight-net-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-4061</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2567#comment-4061</guid>
		<description>I just hope the women who runs the show does her research so she doesn&#039;t let any bullshit claims slide through unchallenged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hope the women who runs the show does her research so she doesn&#8217;t let any bullshit claims slide through unchallenged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/sbs-insight-net-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-4060</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2567#comment-4060</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to see that Insight are picking up this topic, they are usually insightful. ;D

I&#039;m just hoping that those opposed and participating within this show have a high level of knowledge about the technical and/or related issues of the debate.

Maybe Conroy could even make an appearence...
Haha, yeah right. He&#039;ll probably send one of his minions to do his bidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see that Insight are picking up this topic, they are usually insightful. ;D</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just hoping that those opposed and participating within this show have a high level of knowledge about the technical and/or related issues of the debate.</p>
<p>Maybe Conroy could even make an appearence&#8230;<br />
Haha, yeah right. He&#8217;ll probably send one of his minions to do his bidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/sbs-insight-net-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-4057</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2567#comment-4057</guid>
		<description>Good idea. The more TV programs focus on the issue to make the public more aware, the better.

I would participate in the debate myself, but my speech is not good. Perhaps I could get one of my friends to talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea. The more TV programs focus on the issue to make the public more aware, the better.</p>
<p>I would participate in the debate myself, but my speech is not good. Perhaps I could get one of my friends to talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
