Seriously. He actually said it.

The guy’s a loon. The bigger the megaphone he has, the more people he’ll turn off. He’s never going to gain any more supporters than he already has because his views are so extreme, every time he’s given a soapbox he just drives more people to our side.

Keep talking, Jimbo, you’re doing a fabulous job

There were Christian children in Iraq. Fewer now, after the violent break-up of Iraq’s secular State (Tariq Aziz, Foreign Minister under Saddam was a Christian). Wallace didn’t just support the illegal invasion of Iraq undertaken under false pretences – he berated authentic Christian leaders in Australia for not backing it too. There are conservative reports that two thirds of the nation’s Christian’s have now fled the coutnry thanks to Wallace & co.

If that man is a Christian my dog’s a Mormon.

But Wallace is a hypocrite. He was a passionate supporter of the war in Iraq. Many Iraqi children were killed, along with many young American and British troops. So he doesn’t REALLY care about the children–he just uses it as a shield to hide his disgusting bigotry.

Also – say you honestly believed that the government won’t block material that adults can access legally in Australia. Will you then state for the record that if this WAS the result of the filter, you would oppose it? Or is it the case that you don’t care if legal material is blocked or not? One or the other, Jim – yes or no.

And didn’t you hear the IT guy point out that no filter technology presented thus far let all legal content through? Funny, you didn’t seem to have a response to that. Quick, let’s pretend you didn’t hear it.

Finally, your fridge analogy works better as a description of the filter – because of one bad fridge (the small percentage of child pornography on the internet) you want governments to cripple all fridges (the internet).