<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live filtering pilot has no success criteria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/live-filtering-pilot-has-no-success-criteria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/live-filtering-pilot-has-no-success-criteria/</link>
	<description>Australian Censorship Discussion Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:15:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Filtering wrap up: What &#8216;works&#8217; and what kills small ISPs - Somebody Think Of The Children</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/live-filtering-pilot-has-no-success-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-6152</link>
		<dc:creator>Filtering wrap up: What &#8216;works&#8217; and what kills small ISPs - Somebody Think Of The Children</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=3152#comment-6152</guid>
		<description>[...] You may recall that a Freedom of Information request also confirmed that no success criteria has been set for the filtering pilot. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You may recall that a Freedom of Information request also confirmed that no success criteria has been set for the filtering pilot. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitek</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/live-filtering-pilot-has-no-success-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-5640</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=3152#comment-5640</guid>
		<description>Seems like an ordinary disbursement of some cash.

I am wondering why digital Conroy is still up to this filtering, as another disbursement of $43b has started.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like an ordinary disbursement of some cash.</p>
<p>I am wondering why digital Conroy is still up to this filtering, as another disbursement of $43b has started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GW</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/live-filtering-pilot-has-no-success-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-5633</link>
		<dc:creator>GW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=3152#comment-5633</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just $300,000. There&#039;s another $887,000 awarded to Enex as consultants to do the assessment. No test criteria, no test methodology, no written specification. WTF are they doing for $887,000???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just $300,000. There&#8217;s another $887,000 awarded to Enex as consultants to do the assessment. No test criteria, no test methodology, no written specification. WTF are they doing for $887,000???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coenraad</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/live-filtering-pilot-has-no-success-criteria/comment-page-1/#comment-5632</link>
		<dc:creator>Coenraad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=3152#comment-5632</guid>
		<description>An &#039;evidence-based approach&#039; without success criteria? Hilarious. And they&#039;re wasting what, $300,000 on this sham?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An &#8216;evidence-based approach&#8217; without success criteria? Hilarious. And they&#8217;re wasting what, $300,000 on this sham?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
