<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greens Senator quizzes Conroy on filtering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/greens-senator-quizzes-conroy-on-filtering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/greens-senator-quizzes-conroy-on-filtering/</link>
	<description>Australian Censorship Discussion Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Bain</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/greens-senator-quizzes-conroy-on-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-5597</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Bain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 23:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1071#comment-5597</guid>
		<description>@Syd Walker (Who are “NX Test Laboratories”?)

http://enextestlab.blogspot.com/

follow the link on the blog ! 

Also on Twitter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Syd Walker (Who are “NX Test Laboratories”?)</p>
<p><a href="http://enextestlab.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://enextestlab.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>follow the link on the blog ! </p>
<p>Also on Twitter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Labor implement &#8220;clean feed&#8221; without legislation? &#124; EFA</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/greens-senator-quizzes-conroy-on-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-5594</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Labor implement &#8220;clean feed&#8221; without legislation? &#124; EFA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1071#comment-5594</guid>
		<description>[...] defeat.  The Coalition look like they will oppose it, and Senator Scott Ludlam from the Greens was hostile to it in a Senate committee hearing earlier this week, so at this point there appears to be a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] defeat.  The Coalition look like they will oppose it, and Senator Scott Ludlam from the Greens was hostile to it in a Senate committee hearing earlier this week, so at this point there appears to be a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syd Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/greens-senator-quizzes-conroy-on-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-5591</link>
		<dc:creator>Syd Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 06:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1071#comment-5591</guid>
		<description>&quot;NX Test Laboratories&quot; is mentioned in this evidence to the Senate - and I noticed it mentioned again in evidence to the Senate on Tuesday of this week - see 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/senate/commttee/S12032.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this Hansard&lt;/a&gt;

However, when I google up &quot;NX Test Laboratories&quot; &amp; melbourne (like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;client=opera&amp;rls=en&amp;q=%22nx+test+laboratories%22+melbourne&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;THIS&lt;/a&gt;) the only references that come up are links to these same reports from Hansard. 

Who are &quot;NX Test Laboratories&quot;? 

Have they been mis-spelt (on two occasions) in Hansard? 

If not, how come there&#039;s apparently nothing about &quot;NX Test Laboratories&quot; on the web? 

One would have thought a &lt;i&gt;bona fide&lt;/i&gt; test lab /research institute would have saome web presence...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;NX Test Laboratories&#8221; is mentioned in this evidence to the Senate &#8211; and I noticed it mentioned again in evidence to the Senate on Tuesday of this week &#8211; see<br />
<a href="http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard/senate/commttee/S12032.pdf" rel="nofollow">this Hansard</a></p>
<p>However, when I google up &#8220;NX Test Laboratories&#8221; &amp; melbourne (like <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;client=opera&amp;rls=en&amp;q=%22nx+test+laboratories%22+melbourne" rel="nofollow">THIS</a>) the only references that come up are links to these same reports from Hansard. </p>
<p>Who are &#8220;NX Test Laboratories&#8221;? </p>
<p>Have they been mis-spelt (on two occasions) in Hansard? </p>
<p>If not, how come there&#8217;s apparently nothing about &#8220;NX Test Laboratories&#8221; on the web? </p>
<p>One would have thought a <i>bona fide</i> test lab /research institute would have saome web presence&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greens: Taking the Government to task - sw'as</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/greens-senator-quizzes-conroy-on-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-5495</link>
		<dc:creator>Greens: Taking the Government to task - sw'as</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1071#comment-5495</guid>
		<description>[...] the Greens appeal and trying to capture some of that &#039;small l&#039; vote.)). Mike has picked out the juicy parts (as in, the really, really, horrifyingly bad parts) of what Senator Conroy had to say in reply. My [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Greens appeal and trying to capture some of that &#8216;small l&#8217; vote.)). Mike has picked out the juicy parts (as in, the really, really, horrifyingly bad parts) of what Senator Conroy had to say in reply. My [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Body blow to Australian internet censorship &#171; Matts Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/greens-senator-quizzes-conroy-on-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-4016</link>
		<dc:creator>Body blow to Australian internet censorship &#171; Matts Mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1071#comment-4016</guid>
		<description>[...] and two independents, of which Xenophon is one.&#160; The Coalition has indicated that it will go against it but even if not, now that Xenophon has withdrawn support, it&#8217;s unlikely that Labor can gain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and two independents, of which Xenophon is one.&nbsp; The Coalition has indicated that it will go against it but even if not, now that Xenophon has withdrawn support, it&#8217;s unlikely that Labor can gain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam Vickery</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/greens-senator-quizzes-conroy-on-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-3019</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam Vickery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1071#comment-3019</guid>
		<description>TOTALLY AGREED! I&#039;ll vote for ya Brissietex!!

RE:
History has shown that ANY form of censorship eventually gets circumvented…not to mention, abused. Why throw money at something that is clearly not viable or even doable? Better to fund Interpol and local police enforcement to take care of the true criminals.

By Brissietex on Oct 24, 2008

What a waste of 84 Million dollars!!! Imagine what better things could be done with 84,000,000 Dollars?!? Conroy is a joke.
Senator Conroy, the irony here is your title - who put you in charge of this? Is this your red herring attempt at disguising your ineptitude?

The Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Senator Conroy

That should be the minister for Dial-Up internet speeds, Controlling, monitoring and limiting Communication, and Sabotaging the Digital Economy.

That would be more accurate in my opinion, MORON.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TOTALLY AGREED! I&#8217;ll vote for ya Brissietex!!</p>
<p>RE:<br />
History has shown that ANY form of censorship eventually gets circumvented…not to mention, abused. Why throw money at something that is clearly not viable or even doable? Better to fund Interpol and local police enforcement to take care of the true criminals.</p>
<p>By Brissietex on Oct 24, 2008</p>
<p>What a waste of 84 Million dollars!!! Imagine what better things could be done with 84,000,000 Dollars?!? Conroy is a joke.<br />
Senator Conroy, the irony here is your title &#8211; who put you in charge of this? Is this your red herring attempt at disguising your ineptitude?</p>
<p>The Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Senator Conroy</p>
<p>That should be the minister for Dial-Up internet speeds, Controlling, monitoring and limiting Communication, and Sabotaging the Digital Economy.</p>
<p>That would be more accurate in my opinion, MORON.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NSW Parliamentary E-Brief on mandatory filtering - Somebody Think Of The Children</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/greens-senator-quizzes-conroy-on-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-2444</link>
		<dc:creator>NSW Parliamentary E-Brief on mandatory filtering - Somebody Think Of The Children</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1071#comment-2444</guid>
		<description>[...] also examines the state of filtering in other countries often used as examples by Senator Conroy. With the limited exceptions of Germany and Italy, mandatory ISP level filtering is not a feature [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also examines the state of filtering in other countries often used as examples by Senator Conroy. With the limited exceptions of Germany and Italy, mandatory ISP level filtering is not a feature [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conroy misleads the Senate on &#8216;illegal material&#8217; // NOCENSORSHIP.INFO // NO INTERNET FILTER</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/greens-senator-quizzes-conroy-on-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-2190</link>
		<dc:creator>Conroy misleads the Senate on &#8216;illegal material&#8217; // NOCENSORSHIP.INFO // NO INTERNET FILTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1071#comment-2190</guid>
		<description>[...] and the Digital Economy&#8217; (also known as the &#8216;Minister for Child Pornography&#8216;) was grilled in a Senate estimates hearing on Monday of last week.  The Hansard (official transcript) for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and the Digital Economy&#8217; (also known as the &#8216;Minister for Child Pornography&#8216;) was grilled in a Senate estimates hearing on Monday of last week.  The Hansard (official transcript) for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live filtering trial to leave ISPs in the lurch (and what else the EOI tells us) - Somebody Think Of The Children</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/greens-senator-quizzes-conroy-on-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-2150</link>
		<dc:creator>Live filtering trial to leave ISPs in the lurch (and what else the EOI tells us) - Somebody Think Of The Children</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1071#comment-2150</guid>
		<description>[...] few weeks back when Senator Scott Ludlam questioned Senator Conroy about filtering, Conroy said his department didn&#8217;t have any benchmarks set in regards to what is an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few weeks back when Senator Scott Ludlam questioned Senator Conroy about filtering, Conroy said his department didn&#8217;t have any benchmarks set in regards to what is an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoyden About Town</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/greens-senator-quizzes-conroy-on-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-2149</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoyden About Town</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1071#comment-2149</guid>
		<description>[...] Think of the Children: &#8220;Greens Senator quizzes Conroy on filtering&#8220;. 23 Oct [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Think of the Children: &#8220;Greens Senator quizzes Conroy on filtering&#8220;. 23 Oct [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

