<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Filter trial: Gov gives iiNet the cold-shoulder, filter vendors backing small ISPs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/filter-trial-gov-gives-iinet-the-cold-shoulder-filter-vendors-backing-small-isps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/filter-trial-gov-gives-iinet-the-cold-shoulder-filter-vendors-backing-small-isps/</link>
	<description>Australian Censorship Discussion Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkness at Noon &#187; Mark Newton, Jim Wallace debating ISP level filtering</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/filter-trial-gov-gives-iinet-the-cold-shoulder-filter-vendors-backing-small-isps/comment-page-1/#comment-3682</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkness at Noon &#187; Mark Newton, Jim Wallace debating ISP level filtering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2318#comment-3682</guid>
		<description>[...] (from Vimeo via Somebody Think of the Children. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (from Vimeo via Somebody Think of the Children. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Bain</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/filter-trial-gov-gives-iinet-the-cold-shoulder-filter-vendors-backing-small-isps/comment-page-1/#comment-3670</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Bain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2318#comment-3670</guid>
		<description>For those who may not have seen this article here&#039;s a list of ISPs who have indicated they will or will not get involved in the filtering trial and their stated philosophical reasons..

http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/Telstra-out-of-Conroy-s-filtering-trial/0,130061791,339293711,00.htm

&quot;iiNet&#039;s position, described on the site, was that internet filtering did not work, would impact on networks&#039; performance and that the scope of &quot;unwanted&quot; content would grow over time.&quot;

Westnet &quot;We&#039;re just going to lean on the results of iiNet,&quot; a spokesperson for the company said.

People Telecom : &quot;We are not convinced that content filtering makes practical sense and we are concerned at the potential risk to service quality,&quot; the company posted in a forum.

iPrimus : &quot;It&#039;s easy for us to do it,&quot; iPrimus CEO Ravi Bhatia said.

Netspace : &quot;The filtering EOI as we received it was severely lacking in detail and the time frames were too unrealistic for us to participate,&quot; Netscape regulatory and carrier affairs manager Matthew Phillips said. 

Adam Internet : CEO Scott Hicks said that Adam Internet would send a discussion paper to the government on what it thinks should happen — that is that the filtering not go ahead in its current form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who may not have seen this article here&#8217;s a list of ISPs who have indicated they will or will not get involved in the filtering trial and their stated philosophical reasons..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/Telstra-out-of-Conroy-s-filtering-trial/0,130061791,339293711,00.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/Telstra-out-of-Conroy-s-filtering-trial/0,130061791,339293711,00.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8220;iiNet&#8217;s position, described on the site, was that internet filtering did not work, would impact on networks&#8217; performance and that the scope of &#8220;unwanted&#8221; content would grow over time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Westnet &#8220;We&#8217;re just going to lean on the results of iiNet,&#8221; a spokesperson for the company said.</p>
<p>People Telecom : &#8220;We are not convinced that content filtering makes practical sense and we are concerned at the potential risk to service quality,&#8221; the company posted in a forum.</p>
<p>iPrimus : &#8220;It&#8217;s easy for us to do it,&#8221; iPrimus CEO Ravi Bhatia said.</p>
<p>Netspace : &#8220;The filtering EOI as we received it was severely lacking in detail and the time frames were too unrealistic for us to participate,&#8221; Netscape regulatory and carrier affairs manager Matthew Phillips said. </p>
<p>Adam Internet : CEO Scott Hicks said that Adam Internet would send a discussion paper to the government on what it thinks should happen — that is that the filtering not go ahead in its current form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/filter-trial-gov-gives-iinet-the-cold-shoulder-filter-vendors-backing-small-isps/comment-page-1/#comment-3669</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2318#comment-3669</guid>
		<description>iiNet oppose the filter, of course the government are not going to let a trial be run.

Only an idiot would allow an enemy to poke even more holes in their shoddy product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iiNet oppose the filter, of course the government are not going to let a trial be run.</p>
<p>Only an idiot would allow an enemy to poke even more holes in their shoddy product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/filter-trial-gov-gives-iinet-the-cold-shoulder-filter-vendors-backing-small-isps/comment-page-1/#comment-3667</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2318#comment-3667</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’ve been hit up by several filtering vendors over the last year trying to sell me on the idea that their product won’t impinge upon free speech.&quot; 

Isn&#039;t that like saying &quot;our guns won&#039;t kill people&quot;? 

Much like a gun, a censoring system has a single purpose, it cannot do anything else. To suggest otherwise is an outright lie, and a boorish one at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’ve been hit up by several filtering vendors over the last year trying to sell me on the idea that their product won’t impinge upon free speech.&#8221; </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that like saying &#8220;our guns won&#8217;t kill people&#8221;? </p>
<p>Much like a gun, a censoring system has a single purpose, it cannot do anything else. To suggest otherwise is an outright lie, and a boorish one at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
