<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Californication too sexy for TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/</link>
	<description>Australian Censorship Discussion Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Li</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-7381</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/#comment-7381</guid>
		<description>I can just imagine that the heads of the ACMA are full of stern, uptight, religious, conservative white males who dare to make up stupid rules that try to forbid people from watching what they want. And as for those two losers who complained... if they found the scenes to be so immoral (or whatever else kind of bullshit they use to describe these type of scenes), then why did they watch it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can just imagine that the heads of the ACMA are full of stern, uptight, religious, conservative white males who dare to make up stupid rules that try to forbid people from watching what they want. And as for those two losers who complained&#8230; if they found the scenes to be so immoral (or whatever else kind of bullshit they use to describe these type of scenes), then why did they watch it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-4987</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/#comment-4987</guid>
		<description>This is the 21st century, why aren&#039;t tv remotes used?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the 21st century, why aren&#8217;t tv remotes used?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You won&#8217;t see this Lady GaGa music clip on Video Hits - Somebody Think Of The Children</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-4834</link>
		<dc:creator>You won&#8217;t see this Lady GaGa music clip on Video Hits - Somebody Think Of The Children</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/#comment-4834</guid>
		<description>[...] playing by the rules, but I wonder if they&#8217;ll make the same call on future episodes of Californication? Channel Nine is also no stranger to incorrect classifications.  Stay up to date with censorship [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] playing by the rules, but I wonder if they&#8217;ll make the same call on future episodes of Californication? Channel Nine is also no stranger to incorrect classifications.  Stay up to date with censorship [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles solomon</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-3779</link>
		<dc:creator>charles solomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/#comment-3779</guid>
		<description>THIS IS A HUGE DISGRACE TO ALL CALIFORNIANS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS IS A HUGE DISGRACE TO ALL CALIFORNIANS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles solomon</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-3778</link>
		<dc:creator>charles solomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/#comment-3778</guid>
		<description>well it&#039;s none of my business,but publishing such an erotic public display world-wide does not in any way show any sign of morals and self discipline not just to the shameless actor/actress whom with shame expose their chastity to the world,but this serves as a huge disgrace to the producers as well as the directors of such an EROTIC MOVIE,an i must at this juncture register my discomfort for such a movie and advice that stern measures be employered to it&#039;s in the NOLLEYWOOD INDUSTRY.THANKS FOR NOW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well it&#8217;s none of my business,but publishing such an erotic public display world-wide does not in any way show any sign of morals and self discipline not just to the shameless actor/actress whom with shame expose their chastity to the world,but this serves as a huge disgrace to the producers as well as the directors of such an EROTIC MOVIE,an i must at this juncture register my discomfort for such a movie and advice that stern measures be employered to it&#8217;s in the NOLLEYWOOD INDUSTRY.THANKS FOR NOW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SkipEU</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>SkipEU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/californication-too-sexy-for-tv/#comment-781</guid>
		<description>I must admit this is funny thing going on in Australia. 

I still can&#039;t believe that in 21st century government is telling you what you can watch on TV, what you can play, what businesses can show on their private networks etc. And you still vote people like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit this is funny thing going on in Australia. </p>
<p>I still can&#8217;t believe that in 21st century government is telling you what you can watch on TV, what you can play, what businesses can show on their private networks etc. And you still vote people like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

