Comments on: ACMA forces Whirlpool to remove link to banned anti-abortion web page

By: The internet as an instrument of control

The internet as an instrument of control — Tue, 07 Dec 2010 12:51:45 +0000

[...] the content if it is hosted overseas, but it does prevent them from hosting the content, or even linking to it , in [...]

By: Report on Monday’s Anti-Censorship Meeting #sicbne | Stop Internet Censorship

Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:07:21 +0000

[...] * Whirlpool, an Australian-hosted site, has already been forced to take down a link to an anti-abortion site. [...]

By: ACMA issues EFA with Link Deletion Notice - Somebody Think Of The Children

ACMA issues EFA with Link Deletion Notice - Somebody Think Of The Children — Tue, 05 May 2009 07:26:51 +0000

[...] was also issued with a Link Deletion Notice in March after a forum user linked to the same webpage. Because STOTC is hosted in the United [...]

By: MAX

MAX — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:35:01 +0000

Hey, Batman:-)

Yahoo is no better.

IMNSHO

By: ACMA: Linking to blacklisted sites will cost you $11,000 a day. | OzSoapbox

ACMA: Linking to blacklisted sites will cost you $11,000 a day. | OzSoapbox — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:20:58 +0000

[...] either support the filter or you masturbate to child pornography’. As noted by ‘Wontsomebodythinkofthechildren‘ This (ACMA’s threat) comes as Senator Stephen Conroy urged those opposed to the [...]

By: MAX

MAX — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:52:23 +0000

By the way, i’ve been a Labor voter for over 30 years, but no more.
I will NEVER vote Labor again because of this.

By: MAX

MAX — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:46:55 +0000

Why won’t Con(job)roy, ACMA, and that DILL Atkinson learn? Aren’t they LISTENING?
Out of touch & out of line.
Euthanase them!

By: Shared Items - March 18, 2009 « AdamDodson.org

Shared Items - March 18, 2009 « AdamDodson.org — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:04:03 +0000

[...] ACMA forces Whirlpool to remove link to banned anti-abortion web page [...]

By: URL of banned WikiLeaks page published on DBCDE blog - Somebody Think Of The Children

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:07:02 +0000

[...] by a third party can get a website tangled in a filter. Though someone should warn them about those nasty 11k-per-day fines if ACMA gets wind of [...]

By: Bob Bain

Bob Bain — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:13:17 +0000

Please note that as indicated on the Sky News item recently posted to the nocensorshipaus channel the prohibited website is reported as being listed on the ACMA Wikipedia page at:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Communications_and_Media_Authority

Seeming listed under External Links – Prohibited Website.

YouTube video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsXRPipPZAs

From the news video posted two weeks ago..

=================

“An ACMA spokesman confirmed the contents of its letter and said the complainant was not barred from publicising the banned web page. “There is no prohibition on complainants publishing the outcome of their complaints, as has happened in this case,” the spokesman said.”

Source The Australian on-line…

Bob