Comments on: ACMA Blacklist leaked, contains legal websites

By: PJD

PJD — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:07:50 +0000

Call me paranoid but I don’t trust the government. There is no reason why they couldn’t use this to block things they don’t want us to know. Don’t believe me? ask Darren Hinch. You wouldn’t believe the things that don’t make the mainstream news. Then there is all the propaganda and lies they feed people, (look at the lies from the Howard government) this sounds like something the Nazis would have done if the internet had existed back then. If these sites are legitimate child abuse sites, then track down the operators arrest them and shut the sites down. It’s ironic they claim that this is to stop child pornography sites, I remember a few years ago when about 150 computers were seized and police, judges and politicians were arrested, only to have the computers go missing from police storage. Bullshit! they have no intention of stopping child pornography, they’re just pedos looking after there own. This is just another form of control.

By: David

David — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:07:41 +0000

I think this is a disgrace. i understand the principal of this process, but I make responsible choices, i do what is right for myself. i guess this government believes it can dictate to society what it believes to be appropriate (until the next election). BRING BACK DEMOCRACY!!!

By: Masthead Editorials Critical of Canadian Surveillance Legislation

Masthead Editorials Critical of Canadian Surveillance Legislation — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:12:19 +0000

[...] know all too well how web censorship like that can go too far after the ACMA blacklist leak showed perfectly legal sites on them. While the governing body denied the authenticity of the leaked list, there have been suggestions [...]

By: Chinese Government Mandated Search Engine Blacklist Leaked

Chinese Government Mandated Search Engine Blacklist Leaked — Tue, 05 May 2009 19:54:36 +0000

[...] blacklists. The Australian government had their ISP level blacklist leaked – controversy arose when legal sites were discovered on the lists. Very recently, there was a public forum on the matter of government blacklists as well. Viacom, a [...]

By: Ashley

Ashley — Tue, 05 May 2009 09:43:24 +0000

What is wrong with you people.
Stop banning poker websites you idiots

By: tezza

tezza — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:57:45 +0000

someone up a bit mentioned it was illegal to look at just the links (i did click thru to one), is that true? I bookmarked that wikileaks page with all the links coz i bookmark just about everything.

and abbywinters is not blocked.

By: Yehud

Yehud — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:09:02 +0000

David Shankbone one of the worse things on the internet, and he should be censored and arrested. He worked with the Jewish ppornograher Michael Lucas to put fotos on all of the pornography articles on Wikipedia. It is a big mystery why these were deleted, but there are rumors that Jimmy Wales and Wikiedia were being investigated by the FBI – this article was about Shankbone’s fotos:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=63590

Now they are hiding something. Shankbone is now here in Israel – as a guest of the government to take pictures!!!

http://blog.shankbone.org/2009/03/04/my-israel-trip-covered-in-jewish-week/

By: Well...

Well... — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:10:30 +0000

Holy shit – there’s HEAPS of legit porn sites on that list, unless my view of legit is very skewed indeed. bigtitsatwork.com? It’s what it says it is and mostly has milf-type action at that. But I can’t understand why anyone’s in the least bit surprised at all the condradictions and bungling. They want it in to use as a political tool and kiddie porn is the best cover they’ve got. Everyone with a brain’s onto the fact it’s bunkum so what do they care? They’ll keep mouthing it and playing rhetorical games and ignoring protests and busting a few token porn lords until it’s in. They don’t care if we know it’s a charade or not and you can bet your biscuits any subsequent governments won’t be removing the filter. It’s all part of the two-party, single-ideology world we live in.

By: Mavrick

Mavrick — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:11:41 +0000

I think this going to go to far and everybody should think about this, can we get the Australian Government Website blocked
1) site has links to terrorism
2) it also makes this country a terrorist target by giving out information on this country
3) it has previously been hacked to the point of offering porn
4) the website breaks the privacy act
This list can go on and on but I thought I would only give a few points

By: alphamone

alphamone — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:50:58 +0000

about ED (shortened form of that satirical encyclopedia, done like this to avoid trouble), I have to say that it quite often is at the borderline of legal (due to the fact that people use it for online harassment of people, and the spamming of websites with useless topics), and I can understand why it would be on a list.

(though, there should realy not be a list in the first place, and there are plenty of other places where the 4chan /b/ type of trolls organise their harassment of people and websites)