Comments on: ACMA declares anti-abortion site ‘prohibited content’

By: Ryan

Ryan — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:42:52 +0000

ACMA reacting like a child that knows they’ve done something naughty.

It’s a top secret list? Everyone knows what ACMA deems inappropriate. I have a feeling this is no longer about children’s safety.

By: Mandatory filter will block RC - Somebody Think Of The Children

Mandatory filter will block RC - Somebody Think Of The Children — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:18:39 +0000

[...] containing fetishes, euthanasia instruction material like The Peaceful Pill Handbook and of course anti-abortion material. It’s also legal to possess and view in Australia (with the exception of Western Australia [...]

By: Aussie censors block links to links!-The Register « FACT – Freedom Against Censorship Thailand

Sat, 09 May 2009 16:04:19 +0000

[...] in January of this year, ACMA wrote back to a complainant: “ACMA is satisfied that the internet content is hosted outside Australia, [...]

By: lawtears

lawtears — Thu, 07 May 2009 09:08:35 +0000

Good luck. Everyone in Britain with a brain (all 10 of us) is thinking of you. We’re sick of internet stupidity from politicians and we’re not even threatened by the ‘wall yet.

Again, good luck. “We’re all counting on you”

Lawtears

By: ACMA issues EFA with Link Deletion Notice - Somebody Think Of The Children

ACMA issues EFA with Link Deletion Notice - Somebody Think Of The Children — Tue, 05 May 2009 07:24:40 +0000

[...] Deletion Notice because of an article EFA published on their own website containing a link to an anti-abortion webpage declared prohibited content by the media regulator in January this [...]

By: Somebody Think of the Children’s latest « Censorship in Australia

Somebody Think of the Children’s latest « Censorship in Australia — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:25:59 +0000

[...] I found an article on ACMA declaring an anti-abortion website prohibited. I figured as none of us have said much about it I would mention it today. It [...]

By: Five things I learned from the Insight episode on filtering - Somebody Think Of The Children

Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:25:36 +0000

[...] category that includes adult pornography containing fetishes like spanking… oh, and that anti-abortion web page we shouldn’t see. Refused Classification is a broad category of classified and unclassified content that when [...]

By: Patrick

Patrick — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 05:35:58 +0000

Great isnt it we can see dead and blasted to peices bits of bodies everydat on some real news casts but we cant see our own so its not only sex is it Mr faceless its whatr you think is bad and just what makes you the best judge of what I should see Dam little beauracrats should all join the army and go and see the real world of death and destruction bits of bodies get scattered in your name every day you dickheads should be made to look at and pick them up then see if you wish to censor everyone else you pricks

By: Conroy wrong again: Says ACMA blacklist hasn’t been updated, RC illegal - Somebody Think Of The Children

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:40:11 +0000

[...] is included under the March 2009 site additions. Furthermore, ACMA also included a now famous anti-abortion website on their list in January. It is general knowledge that ACMA is still operating and adding websites to a [...]

By: New ACMA blacklist leaked: 1170 URLs dated March 18 - Somebody Think Of The Children

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:10:32 +0000

[...] Breaking News: WikiLeaks.org has released a version of what is alleged to be the current ACMA blacklist. This list is dated March 18 and includes 1170 URLs, including the now high-profile AbortionTV page. [...]