<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australian Christian Lobby responsible for increased pro-filtering comments?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/acl-increased-pro-filtering-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/acl-increased-pro-filtering-comments/</link>
	<description>Australian Censorship Discussion Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/acl-increased-pro-filtering-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-5729</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2457#comment-5729</guid>
		<description>Why are the Christians using the Internet anyway?

To paraphrase an oft used argument, &quot;God invented Adam and Eve, not Adam and Eve and the Internet!&quot;.

tsk tsk!

James.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are the Christians using the Internet anyway?</p>
<p>To paraphrase an oft used argument, &#8220;God invented Adam and Eve, not Adam and Eve and the Internet!&#8221;.</p>
<p>tsk tsk!</p>
<p>James.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/acl-increased-pro-filtering-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3969</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2457#comment-3969</guid>
		<description>I posted several anti-filter comments on BOTH sites, over several days.
Not one got through.

Not happy, Jan....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted several anti-filter comments on BOTH sites, over several days.<br />
Not one got through.</p>
<p>Not happy, Jan&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilaeria</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/acl-increased-pro-filtering-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3926</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilaeria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2457#comment-3926</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve posted a couple more comments on Conroy&#039;s blog this evening, here&#039;s hoping they get through.  2 points I&#039;m concerned about - many of the pro-filter camp don&#039;t seem concerned that the filter may block legitimate and legal content - the WANT it to block nudity and &quot;filth&quot;!  Also, they seem to be confused about how the filter is supposed to work.  They seem to think that the filter is designed to stop *children* viewing pornography involving *adults*, when it is supposed to stop *adults* viewing pornography involving *children*!  The mandatory filter will not make it harder for children to &quot;accidentally&quot; view pornography (and yes, I remember telling my parents it was an &quot;accident&quot;!).  I&#039;m very concerned that someone is spreading false and misleading propaganda to the pro-filter camp.  Or perhaps they just don&#039;t understand how it works, or don&#039;t care?  It seems to me that anti-filter people are generally more net-savvy and interested in FACT, while the pro-filter camp are &quot;technologically challenged&quot; and interested in EMOTIONS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve posted a couple more comments on Conroy&#8217;s blog this evening, here&#8217;s hoping they get through.  2 points I&#8217;m concerned about &#8211; many of the pro-filter camp don&#8217;t seem concerned that the filter may block legitimate and legal content &#8211; the WANT it to block nudity and &#8220;filth&#8221;!  Also, they seem to be confused about how the filter is supposed to work.  They seem to think that the filter is designed to stop *children* viewing pornography involving *adults*, when it is supposed to stop *adults* viewing pornography involving *children*!  The mandatory filter will not make it harder for children to &#8220;accidentally&#8221; view pornography (and yes, I remember telling my parents it was an &#8220;accident&#8221;!).  I&#8217;m very concerned that someone is spreading false and misleading propaganda to the pro-filter camp.  Or perhaps they just don&#8217;t understand how it works, or don&#8217;t care?  It seems to me that anti-filter people are generally more net-savvy and interested in FACT, while the pro-filter camp are &#8220;technologically challenged&#8221; and interested in EMOTIONS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syd Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/acl-increased-pro-filtering-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3884</link>
		<dc:creator>Syd Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2457#comment-3884</guid>
		<description>My latest (utterly mystified!) article about the fiasco, FWIW: 

Superblog down the Whirlpool?
at
http://sydwalker.info/blog/2009/02/20/superblog-down-the-whirlpool/

If it contains errors, please let me know. 

I can&#039;t seem to find comments about the Conroy/Hamilton article takedown, here or at Whirlpool. 

Perhaps the Government has blanked out the article just for me - to test an extremely clever new technology? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My latest (utterly mystified!) article about the fiasco, FWIW: </p>
<p>Superblog down the Whirlpool?<br />
at<br />
<a href="http://sydwalker.info/blog/2009/02/20/superblog-down-the-whirlpool/" rel="nofollow">http://sydwalker.info/blog/2009/02/20/superblog-down-the-whirlpool/</a></p>
<p>If it contains errors, please let me know. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t seem to find comments about the Conroy/Hamilton article takedown, here or at Whirlpool. </p>
<p>Perhaps the Government has blanked out the article just for me &#8211; to test an extremely clever new technology? <img src='http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Superblog down the Whirlpool?</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/acl-increased-pro-filtering-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3883</link>
		<dc:creator>Superblog down the Whirlpool?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2457#comment-3883</guid>
		<description>[...] checked out Somebody Think of the Children - a great source of reliable, up-to-date info about the Internet censorship issue in Australia. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] checked out Somebody Think of the Children &#8211; a great source of reliable, up-to-date info about the Internet censorship issue in Australia. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/acl-increased-pro-filtering-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3873</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2457#comment-3873</guid>
		<description>No worries :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries <img src='http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbles</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/acl-increased-pro-filtering-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3871</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2457#comment-3871</guid>
		<description>Mike, I appreciated your comment about free speech it was more the &quot;ACL trying to manipulate&quot; comment from another post that got me going!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, I appreciated your comment about free speech it was more the &#8220;ACL trying to manipulate&#8221; comment from another post that got me going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/acl-increased-pro-filtering-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3870</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2457#comment-3870</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Robbles&lt;/b&gt;

I don&#039;t have a problem with the ACL&#039;s call to action. I support it. As I wrote in my post, &#039;Good on ‘em. It’s free speech at work...&#039;.

The post merely draws attention to one of the possible reasons for the increase in filter supporter comments (and the lack of factual information in said comments) on Australian IT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Robbles</b></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with the ACL&#8217;s call to action. I support it. As I wrote in my post, &#8216;Good on ‘em. It’s free speech at work&#8230;&#8217;.</p>
<p>The post merely draws attention to one of the possible reasons for the increase in filter supporter comments (and the lack of factual information in said comments) on Australian IT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbles</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/acl-increased-pro-filtering-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3869</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2457#comment-3869</guid>
		<description>So the ACL has encouraged its contacts to speak up.  So what?  Tell me Eros &amp; GetUp and others do not do the same!  Or is speech only free when you say something I agree with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the ACL has encouraged its contacts to speak up.  So what?  Tell me Eros &amp; GetUp and others do not do the same!  Or is speech only free when you say something I agree with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/acl-increased-pro-filtering-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-3867</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=2457#comment-3867</guid>
		<description>Some comments have disappeared from the Conroy blog. One of my comments yesterday was one of the victims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some comments have disappeared from the Conroy blog. One of my comments yesterday was one of the victims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

