<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7:30 Report tackles filtering again this week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/730-report-tackles-filtering-again-monday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/730-report-tackles-filtering-again-monday/</link>
	<description>Australian Censorship Discussion Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conroy&#8217;s &#8216;Clean Feed&#8217; Support Evaporating</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/730-report-tackles-filtering-again-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-2679</link>
		<dc:creator>Conroy&#8217;s &#8216;Clean Feed&#8217; Support Evaporating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1651#comment-2679</guid>
		<description>[...] But deep cracks are appearing in the Government’s case. It’s indicative that Senator Conroy continues to avoid scrutiny and risk critical interviews. Last week he ducked an opportunity to explain his policy on the ABC 7.30 Report. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But deep cracks are appearing in the Government’s case. It’s indicative that Senator Conroy continues to avoid scrutiny and risk critical interviews. Last week he ducked an opportunity to explain his policy on the ABC 7.30 Report. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoyden About Town</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/730-report-tackles-filtering-again-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-2636</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoyden About Town</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1651#comment-2636</guid>
		<description>[...] Think of the Children: &#8220;7:30 Report tackles filtering again this week&#8220;. 23 Nov 2008 (includes video of the 7:30 report programme, which featured many of the key [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Think of the Children: &#8220;7:30 Report tackles filtering again this week&#8220;. 23 Nov 2008 (includes video of the 7:30 report programme, which featured many of the key [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hows</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/730-report-tackles-filtering-again-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-2608</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1651#comment-2608</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Jon. The government has proposed this as a solution to child pornography, this is not a preventative method. While the blocking of some images may occur there is no way that this system would lead to increased arrests and a decrease of the number of children abused within this system?

Think of the children you say? Clearly the ALP is thinking of the best way to allow the abuse of children to continue while still being seen as &#039;proactive&#039;.

I would further put it to Hon Stephen Conroy that he perhaps takes liberties with minors and captures it. As he has proposed that all those against his plan do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Jon. The government has proposed this as a solution to child pornography, this is not a preventative method. While the blocking of some images may occur there is no way that this system would lead to increased arrests and a decrease of the number of children abused within this system?</p>
<p>Think of the children you say? Clearly the ALP is thinking of the best way to allow the abuse of children to continue while still being seen as &#8216;proactive&#8217;.</p>
<p>I would further put it to Hon Stephen Conroy that he perhaps takes liberties with minors and captures it. As he has proposed that all those against his plan do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Bain</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/730-report-tackles-filtering-again-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-2578</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Bain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1651#comment-2578</guid>
		<description>This can also be viewed directly from the ABC video website

 http://www.abc.net.au/news/video/

 It&#039;s moved down the list as news comes in.  It&#039;s on the second page at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This can also be viewed directly from the ABC video website</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/video/" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc.net.au/news/video/</a></p>
<p> It&#8217;s moved down the list as news comes in.  It&#8217;s on the second page at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Seymour</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/730-report-tackles-filtering-again-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-2569</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Seymour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1651#comment-2569</guid>
		<description>I am getting rather tired of the argument that &quot;if it even saves one child, isn&#039;t it worth it?&quot;. In this post, I ask the question: &lt;a href=&quot;http://broadbannedrevolution.blogspot.com/2008/11/government-approved-illegal-pornography.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;What if it doesn&#039;t? What if it makes the problem worse?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am getting rather tired of the argument that &#8220;if it even saves one child, isn&#8217;t it worth it?&#8221;. In this post, I ask the question: <a href="http://broadbannedrevolution.blogspot.com/2008/11/government-approved-illegal-pornography.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;What if it doesn&#8217;t? What if it makes the problem worse?&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/730-report-tackles-filtering-again-monday/comment-page-1/#comment-2560</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/?p=1651#comment-2560</guid>
		<description>This was a nice well rounded report, giving equal voice to both parties. I think this is the first major media to really cover this. Hopefully other current affairs programs follow suite. 

Let the people of Australia decide; I think people will overwhelmingly be against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a nice well rounded report, giving equal voice to both parties. I think this is the first major media to really cover this. Hopefully other current affairs programs follow suite. </p>
<p>Let the people of Australia decide; I think people will overwhelmingly be against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
