Archive for January, 2008

Family First wants sites promoting anorexia to go, what next?

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008

I raised a few of my own concerns about what was written in the filtering article that appeared in today's Australian, but EFA Chairperson, Dale Clapperton, has dissected the article with much more precision. He highlights two of its biggest problems: Random statistics that cannot be confirmed, and Family First ...

How do I explain to friends & colleagues why we shouldn’t introduce mandatory filtering

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008

One question some of you might be asking is: How do I explain to my friends/co-workers/partner/dog why we shouldn't introduce mandatory ISP filtering in Australia? Louise Schaper wrote me with a great letter which includes a number of points you can mention (content written in orange is where I have ...

Sign the petition against mandatory Internet filtering

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008

As requested, a petition has been set up. Sign it to show you disagree with mandatory Internet filtering in Australia: http://petitions.takingitglobal.org/oznetcensorship It will take just 30 seconds. Max.

NetAlarmed featured in The Australian, Conroy stands firm

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008

NetAlarmed was today included in The Australian's article on mandatory filtering - the first real update on the situation since Conroy confirmed the plan. And in case your wondering, no, he's not backing down. Some important bits from the article: Senator Conroy has been prodded into action by Family First senator ...

Kiwi company may help Rudd filter net, but it won’t be easy

Monday, January 7th, 2008

New Zealand company, Watchdog, says that filtering out child pornography at ISP level in Australia is possible, but admits that the Australian Government's attempts to rate websites for violent content and other objectionable material will be extremely difficult. Watchdog currently provides a filtered ISP service to NZ and Australian customers, ...

Good content, bad content: What will be banned under the new filter

Monday, January 7th, 2008

A lot of people are asking what will be banned under the new mandatory filtering scheme for those who do not opt-out. Exactly what criteria will be used to decide if a site is blacklisted? I contacted Mr Conroy in November last year with that question. Here is part of ...

Two must-join email lists for staying on top of Aussie censorship issues

Sunday, January 6th, 2008

If you're looking to stay up to date on the latest censorship issues in Australia, there are two must-join email lists. The first is the EFA Stop Censorship list. This list has been active for many years and is frequented by numerous Australian censorship experts, including Irene Graham. It has ...

Ovum report finds Australian ISP level filtering will cost the customer and give big biz advantage

Sunday, January 6th, 2008

The Howard Government commissioned a number of investigations into the effectiveness of Internet content filtering, including filtering at an ISP level and at an even higher Government/Internet backbone level. One of these investigations was conducted by Melbourne telecoms and software consulting firm, Ovum, in 2003 on behalf of the Department ...

NetAlarmed.com - Thanks for visiting

Sunday, January 6th, 2008

When I created NetAlarmed back in September '07, I really didn't expect it to get such a massive response. Originally the site mocked the filtering plans of the Howard Government and ALP (the current plan about to be implemented), and all I hoped it would do is ...